From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swanson v. Eichler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-03010.

December 15, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated February 11, 2009, which denied his motion, in effect, to restore the action insofar as asserted against the defendant Allen R. Frank to the trial calendar.

Anthony C. Donofrio, Massapequa, N.Y., for appellant.

Santangelo Slattery (James W. Tuffin, Roslyn, N.Y. [Gabriel Mignella], of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"A plaintiff seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar more than one year after it was stricken, and after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, must establish: (1) a meritorious cause of action, (2) a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecution of the action, (3) a lack of intent to abandon the action, and (4) a lack of prejudice to the defendant" ( Borrelli v Maye, 293 AD2d 506). Since the plaintiff failed to establish the last three of those factors, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar ( see Magnone v Gemm Custom Brokers, Inc., 17 AD3d 412; Schwartz v Mandelbaum Gluck, 266 AD2d 273; cf. Sheridan v Mid-Island Hosp., Inc., 9 AD3d 490).


Summaries of

Swanson v. Eichler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Swanson v. Eichler

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MICHAEL SWANSON, Appellant, v. MILTON EICHLER et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9458
889 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

Madsguard v. City of New York

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. A case marked off the trial calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404…

BERDE v. NORTH SHORE

The statute "was adopted for the purpose of getting rid of cases that are actually dead by striking them from…