From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Swainson v. Mohela

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
21-CV-5378 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-5378 (RA)

11-02-2021

RAYMOND SWAINSON, Plaintiff, v. MOHELA, TRANSUNION, LLC, EXPERIAN, AND EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICE, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

During the telephonic status conference held in this case on September 17, 2021, the Court directed Defendants to submit a joint letter by the end of September advising the Court as to whether the parties consented to proceeding with a settlement conference. Defendant TransUnion was not present during that call, as it had not yet appeared in the case. Both Defendant Mohela and Plaintiff have since submitted letters stating that they consent to a settlement conference. Dkts. 25, 33. TransUnion has not so advised the Court; instead, it has filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. Dkt. 35. No. later than November 9, 2021, TransUnion shall advise the Court as to whether it consents to a settlement conference with Plaintiff and Defendant Mohela, either before Magistrate Judge Cave or with a mediator from the Court's mediation program.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Swainson v. Mohela

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
21-CV-5378 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Swainson v. Mohela

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND SWAINSON, Plaintiff, v. MOHELA, TRANSUNION, LLC, EXPERIAN, AND…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

21-CV-5378 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)