From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Svete v. Wunderlich

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 7, 2009
Civil Action 2:07-CV-156 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:07-CV-156.

July 7, 2009


ORDER


On June 11, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendant Whitfield's motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's discovery responses be denied. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Defendant Whitfield's motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's discovery responses, Doc. No. 133, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Svete v. Wunderlich

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 7, 2009
Civil Action 2:07-CV-156 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Svete v. Wunderlich

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. SVETE, Plaintiff, v. MD HOWARD F. WUNDERLICH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 7, 2009

Citations

Civil Action 2:07-CV-156 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 7, 2009)