Svete v. Cherneskey Heyman Kress

Full title: DAVID W. SVETE, Plaintiff, v. CHERNESKEY HEYMAN KRESS, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Dec 16, 2009

Case No. 3:07cv00197 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv00197.

December 16, 2009

DECISION AND ENTRY

WALTER RICE, District Judge

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #69), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS in full said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on November 24, 2009 (Doc. #69) is ADOPTED in full;

2. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. #54) is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. #62) and Plaintiff's Pro Se Motion For Continuance Pursuant To Rule 56(f) (Doc. #65) are DENIED;

4. Plaintiff's Motion For Ruling On Two Motions Pending Before The Court (Doc. #60) is DENIED as moot;

5. Plaintiff's Motion For The Court To Direct United States Marshals To Serve Remaining Unserved Defendants (Doc. #61) is DENIED as moot; and

6. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.