From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Inc.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 13, 2020
No. 05-20-00018-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-20-00018-CV

04-13-2020

MICHAEL SUTTON, Appellant v. OCTAPHARMA PLASMA INCORPORATED, Appellee


On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-06879

ORDER

The clerk's record in this case is overdue. By order dated March 5, 2020, we granted appellant's request to extend time to file the clerk's record so that certain documents could be identified and filed under seal. We ordered the clerk's record to be filed by March 19, 2020. To date, the clerk's record has not been filed and appellant has not further corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk's record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the clerk's record, or (2) written verification that appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs and has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification he is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs and has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Felicia Pitre

Dallas County District Clerk

All parties

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Inc.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 13, 2020
No. 05-20-00018-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Sutton v. Octapharma Plasma Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SUTTON, Appellant v. OCTAPHARMA PLASMA INCORPORATED, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Apr 13, 2020

Citations

No. 05-20-00018-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 13, 2020)