From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suttles v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00658 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 9, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:12-CV-00658

07-09-2013

TAMMY SUTTLES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, in which she recommends that the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income benefits be reversed because it is not supported by substantial evidence in the record and that the case be remanded pre-judgment under sentence six for, among other things, consideration of new and material evidence (doc. 13). No objections to her Report and Recommendation were filed.

Having reviewed this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 13) in all respects. The Court thus REMANDS this case pre-judgment under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a hearing consistent with the mandates set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter until after the entry of final judgment after remand.

SO ORDERED.

____________________

S. Arthur Spiegel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Suttles v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2013
NO. 1:12-CV-00658 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Suttles v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY SUTTLES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 9, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:12-CV-00658 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 9, 2013)