From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutphin v. State, ex rel

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 6, 1935
198 N.E. 483 (Ohio 1935)

Opinion

No. 25324

Decided November 6, 1935.

Mandamus — Writ denied to control discretion — Boxing commission exercised discretion authorized by rules and contract.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Ezra Z. Shapiro, director of law, and Mr. Alfred Lawrence, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. James C. Connell, Mr. Francis Poulson and Mr. Francis B. Douglass, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; and this court proceeding to render the judgment that the Court of Appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

This court finds from the record that the Boxing and Wrestling Commission was authorized to adopt rules; that that commission adopted such rules; that the defendants in error entered into an agreement making such rules govern the contest, and that the rules lodged discretion in such commission, which discretion was exercised in accordance therewith.

Mandamus will lie to compel, but not to control, the exercise of discretion. State, ex rel. Armstrong, v. Davey, Governor, ante, 160.

Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed, and that of Common Pleas affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sutphin v. State, ex rel

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 6, 1935
198 N.E. 483 (Ohio 1935)
Case details for

Sutphin v. State, ex rel

Case Details

Full title:SUTPHIN ET AL. v. THE STATE, EX REL. JEBY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 6, 1935

Citations

198 N.E. 483 (Ohio 1935)
198 N.E. 483

Citing Cases

State ex rel. School District No. 29 v. Cooney

he state board be compelled to grant a hearing, it cannot be compelled to accredit the Somers school unless…