From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutika v. Roscommon Cnty. Clerk

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 9, 2017
SC: 155416 (Mich. Mar. 9, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155416

03-09-2017

JAMES SUTIKA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY CLERK, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

155416 & (24)(25) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 337144
Roscommon CC: 16-723378-AS

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to expedite are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. However, we ORDER the Court of Appeals to expedite its consideration of this case.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Sutika v. Roscommon Cnty. Clerk

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 9, 2017
SC: 155416 (Mich. Mar. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Sutika v. Roscommon Cnty. Clerk

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SUTIKA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROSCOMMON COUNTY CLERK…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 9, 2017

Citations

SC: 155416 (Mich. Mar. 9, 2017)