Opinion
Argued January 19, 1891
Decided February 24, 1891
John H. Peck for appellant.
Charles E. Patterson for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Sutherland v. the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
125 N.Y. 737 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Sutherland v. the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
125 N.Y. 737 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Sutherland v. the Troy and Boston R.R. Co.
Case Details
Full title:REBECCA SUTHERLAND, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . THE TROY AND…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 24, 1891
Citations
125 N.Y. 737 (N.Y. 1891)
35 N.Y. St. Rptr. 853
26 N.E. 609
Citing Cases
Oregon Short Line & U. N. Ry. Co. v. Frost
This conclusion, in my opinion, is sustained by the weight of reason and authority. In Sutherland v. Railroad…
Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. DixonSee Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Bentz, 40 C. C.A. 56, where a failure of the telegraph operator to…