From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutherland v. Herrmann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P

02-26-2013

WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND, Plaintiff, v. S. HERRMANN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 5, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 5, 2013, are adopted in full;

2. The April 25, 2012 motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants Spinks and Parmar (Doc. No. 95) is denied; and

3. The matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

______________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sutherland v. Herrmann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Sutherland v. Herrmann

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM YOUNG SUTHERLAND, Plaintiff, v. S. HERRMANN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2391 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)