From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Surratt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 10, 2012
3:10-CV-01555-AC (D. Or. Apr. 10, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-CV-01555-AC

04-10-2012

AMANDA SURRATT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#18) on March 19, 2012, in which he recommends this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits for further administrative proceedings. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#18). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Surratt v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 10, 2012
3:10-CV-01555-AC (D. Or. Apr. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Surratt v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:AMANDA SURRATT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2012

Citations

3:10-CV-01555-AC (D. Or. Apr. 10, 2012)