Supanich v. Ned

Full title: ROBERT SUPANICH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YVONNE NED, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 5, 2015

2:15-cv-202-JAM-KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2015)

Opinion

ROBERT SUPANICH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YVONNE NED, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-202-JAM-KJN PS United States District Court, E.D. California. March 5, 2015

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         On January 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed.

         Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

         The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED.

         2. The action is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court.

         3. The Clerk of Court shall serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the Sacramento County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (14UD09746) in the proof of service.

         4. The Clerk of Court shall vacate all dates and close this case.