From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SunTrust Bank v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
No. 3:12-0001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0001

12-19-2012

SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG B. JONES, et al., Defendants.


Judge Sharp


ORDER

After Magistrate Judge Bryant issued an Order requiring Plaintiff Suntrust to show cause on or before August 24, 2012, as to why the complaint should not be dismissed for failure to obtain service of process on Defendants, and Plaintiff failed to respond to that Order, he entered a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 17), recommending that the case be dismissed. No objections have been made to the R & R, and the time for filing such objections has run.

The R& R (Docket No. 17) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED for failure to obtain service on Defendants in accordance with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

It is SO ORDERED.

___________

KEVIN H. SHARP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

SunTrust Bank v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
No. 3:12-0001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

SunTrust Bank v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG B. JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0001 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)