From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sumpter v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
Nov 13, 2015
NO. 2013-CA-002064-MR (Ky. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2013-CA-002064-MR

11-13-2015

PAUL SUMPTER APPELLANT v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT: Kathleen K. Schmidt Robert C. Yang Frankfort, Kentucky BRIEF FOR APPELLEE: Jack Conway Attorney General of Kentucky James C. Shackelford Assistant Attorney General Frankfort, Kentucky


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT
HONORABLE FRED A. STINE V, JUDGE
ACTION NO. 12-CR-00363
OPINION
REVERSING AND REMANDING
BEFORE: DIXON, JONES AND NICKELL, JUDGES. JONES, JUDGE: This matter is on direct appeal to this Court from a judgment and sentence entered by the Campbell Circuit Court. It arose out of allegations that the Appellant, Paul Sumpter, sexually abused two individuals, P.S. and C.R., during the 1970s and 1980s. During Sumpter's trial, P.S. and C.R. testified about various sex acts Sumpter performed on them over the course of several years. Ultimately, the jury convicted Sumpter of: 1) second-degree sodomy of C.R.; 2) third-degree sodomy of C.R.; 3) third-degree rape of C.R.; 4) first-degree sexual abuse of P.S.; 5) third-degree sodomy of P.S.; and 6) third-degree rape of P.S. Sumpter was sentenced to a total of 18 years.

On appeal Sumpter argues that the instructions given to his jury violated his right to a unanimous verdict because they failed to differentiate factually between the alleged instances of sexual abuse. In light of Kingrey v. Commonwealth, 396 S.W.3d 824, 830 (Ky. 2013), rendered during the pendency of this appeal, the Commonwealth concedes that the instructions in this case were deficient and deprived Sumpter of a right to a unanimous verdict, a fundamental error giving rise to manifest injustice. Rightly, the Commonwealth agrees with Sumpter that the erroneous instructions require us to reverse Sumpter's convictions and remand for further proceedings. This renders the remainder of Sumpter's arguments moot.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, we reverse and remand.

ALL CONCUR. BRIEF FOR APPELLANT: Kathleen K. Schmidt
Robert C. Yang
Frankfort, Kentucky
BRIEF FOR APPELLEE: Jack Conway
Attorney General of Kentucky
James C. Shackelford
Assistant Attorney General
Frankfort, Kentucky


Summaries of

Sumpter v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
Nov 13, 2015
NO. 2013-CA-002064-MR (Ky. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Sumpter v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SUMPTER APPELLANT v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE

Court:Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 13, 2015

Citations

NO. 2013-CA-002064-MR (Ky. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2015)