From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Summers v. Trimbal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 12, 2023
2:11-cv-02584 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:11-cv-02584 TLN AC

10-12-2023

GREGORY SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. TRIMBAL, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is proceeding through appointed counsel in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 19, 2014, this case was stayed pending exhaustion of state court remedies. ECF No. 59. In the same order, petitioner was directed to file a motion to lift the stay of this action within 30 days from the date of a final decision by the California Supreme Court. ECF No. 59. A review of the docket in this case reveals that no such motion has been filed in the almost 10 years that this case has been stayed. Therefore, petitioner is ordered to show cause within 21 days why the stay of this action should not be lifted and what state remedies have been exhausted or remain to be exhausted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause in writing within 21 days from the date of this order why the stay of this case should not be lifted.


Summaries of

Summers v. Trimbal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 12, 2023
2:11-cv-02584 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Summers v. Trimbal

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY SUMMERS, Petitioner, v. TRIMBAL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

2:11-cv-02584 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2023)