From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Williams

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Aug 26, 2008
CASE NO. 2:05-cv-1033-MEF (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:05-cv-1033-MEF (WO).

August 26, 2008


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #89) to which timely objections (Doc. #96) were filed. The Magistrate Judge filed a Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. #98) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation as supplemented should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation and the Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED; Defendants' MOTIONS for Summary Judgment (Doc. #18 63) on Plaintiff's due process, equal protection, and access to courts claim are GRANTED; Plaintiff's pendent state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Williams

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Aug 26, 2008
CASE NO. 2:05-cv-1033-MEF (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SULLIVAN, #157 996 Plaintiff, v. SIDNEY WILLIAMS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Aug 26, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 2:05-cv-1033-MEF (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2008)

Citing Cases

Watkins v. State Bd. of Pardons & Paroles

The claim fails for that reason alone. See id.; Order, Dixon v. State Bd. of Pardons and Parole, No.…

Nix v. Ala. Bd. of Pardon & Paroles

“Not only does the Board have a duty to consider in good faith all relevant information in an inmate's parole…