From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Sullivan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 21, 2020
295 So. 3d 390 (La. 2020)

Opinion

NO. 2020-CC-0456

04-21-2020

Michael Clinton SULLIVAN v. Martha Adele SULLIVAN


PER CURIAM

Granted in part. Considering the unique circumstances presented, the judgment of the district court denying relator's motion is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of conducting a contradictory hearing on the motion on an expedited basis. This hearing may be conducted by telephone, video, teleconferencing, or any other means that do not involve in-person contact, as authorized by this court's order of April 6, 2020 and related orders. In all other respects, the application is denied.

Hughes, J., would deny.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Sullivan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 21, 2020
295 So. 3d 390 (La. 2020)
Case details for

Sullivan v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CLINTON SULLIVAN v. MARTHA ADELE SULLIVAN

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 21, 2020

Citations

295 So. 3d 390 (La. 2020)