From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 20, 2015
No. 04-15-00493-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 04-15-00493-CR

08-20-2015

La Quint SULLIVAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2015CR7177
Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed several pro se motions in this court. The record reflects that appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid or dual representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981) (criminal defendant has no right to represent himself pro se and be represented by an attorney at the same time); see also Castillo v. State, No. 04-04-00169-CR, 2005 WL 357155, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Feb. 16, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

/s/_________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Sullivan v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 20, 2015
No. 04-15-00493-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Sullivan v. State

Case Details

Full title:La Quint SULLIVAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

No. 04-15-00493-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 20, 2015)