From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 21, 2022
351 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-3765

09-21-2022

Leith James SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Leith James Sullivan, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Leith James Sullivan, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies Petitioner's amended petition for belated appeal because it does not articulate a sufficient factual basis demonstrating an entitlement to belated appeal as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(F). See Williams v. State , 79 So. 3d 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Kelsey, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 21, 2022
351 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Sullivan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leith James SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 21, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)