From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. Spartanburg

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2007
225 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2007)

Summary

noting that the plaintiff's claims were meritless

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Wells

Opinion

No. 06-6531.

Submitted: March 14, 2007.

Decided: May 3, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:05-cv-01282-HFF).

David Farrell Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


David Farrell Sullivan appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm based upon the district court's and magistrate judge's conclusions that Sullivan's claims are meritless. See Sullivan v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:05-cv-01282-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. Spartanburg

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2007
225 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2007)

noting that the plaintiff's claims were meritless

Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Wells
Case details for

Sullivan v. Spartanburg

Case Details

Full title:David Farrell SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 3, 2007

Citations

225 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Wells

This action is the third plaintiff has filed seeking relief based on the same facts, similar legal grounds,…

Sullivan v. McMaster

Further, Plaintiff could have sought habeas relief while in custody, as demonstrated by three prior § 1983…