From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullivan v. County of Santa Clara

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 1, 2005
No. C05-01735 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2005)

Opinion

No. C05-01735 RMW.

December 1, 2005

ANN MILLER RAVEL, County Counsel, LORI E. PEGG, Lead Deputy County Counsel, LISA HERRICK, Deputy County Counsel, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL, San Jose, California, Attorneys for Defendants.

CHARLES A. BONNER, Attorney for Plaintiff.


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER


STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff, Richard Sullivan, and defendants, County of Santa Clara, Probation Department of the County of Santa Clara, Jess Lopez and Barbara Davis, through their undersigned counsel, that the entire action be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT the Court shall direct the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the entire action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

ORDER

THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. The entire action be dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

2. The clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the entire action with prejudice.

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.


Summaries of

Sullivan v. County of Santa Clara

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 1, 2005
No. C05-01735 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2005)
Case details for

Sullivan v. County of Santa Clara

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, BOARD OF…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2005

Citations

No. C05-01735 RMW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2005)