From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sullen v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 17, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv151-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 17, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv151-MHT (WO)

03-17-2020

WILLIE ARTHUR SULLEN, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON DUNN, et al., Defendants.


OPINION

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit challenging that his classification as a restricted offender and complaining that application of the "R" suffix to his records violated his due process and equal protection rights. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. Also before the court are plaintiff's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that plaintiff's objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 17th day of March, 2020.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sullen v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 17, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv151-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Sullen v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE ARTHUR SULLEN, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON DUNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv151-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 17, 2020)