Summary
finding "clear need for the use of force" where plaintiff "physically resisted efforts to close his cell door . . . ."
Summary of this case from Williams v. WarrenOpinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00065-TES-CHW
05-18-2020
STEPHON W SUGGS, Plaintiff, v. MYKENA INGRAM, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION
In his Recommendation [Doc. 29], the United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 20] and deny Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [Doc. 27]. No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's Recommendation; therefore, the Court reviews his findings for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation [Doc. 29] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 20] and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order [Doc. 27].
SO ORDERED, this 18th day of May, 2020.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT