From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sugarman v. Weisz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 8, 1971
270 N.E.2d 330 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

affirming determination that no accounting can be ordered where plaintiff failed to prove that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties

Summary of this case from BANGKOK CRAFTS CORP. v. CAPITOLO DI SAN PIETRO IN VATICANO

Opinion

Argued February 24, 1971

Decided April 8, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDWARD T. McCAFFREY, J.

Jay H. Landau and Edward Brodsky for appellant.

Barry H. Singer and Martin I. Kaminsky for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI. BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Sugarman v. Weisz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 8, 1971
270 N.E.2d 330 (N.Y. 1971)

affirming determination that no accounting can be ordered where plaintiff failed to prove that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties

Summary of this case from BANGKOK CRAFTS CORP. v. CAPITOLO DI SAN PIETRO IN VATICANO
Case details for

Sugarman v. Weisz

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN A. SUGARMAN, Appellant, v. DAVID WEISZ et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 8, 1971

Citations

270 N.E.2d 330 (N.Y. 1971)
270 N.E.2d 330
321 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

Schreier v. Mascola

Accordingly, I vote to affirm Special Term's order. The sufficiency of the complaint is not at issue on this…

Klonick v. Equitable Life Assur

None of these sections or provisions requires that a detailed accounting be furnished the insured. Nor is…