From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sugarman et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 1, 1935
195 N.E. 867 (Ohio 1935)

Opinion

No. 25318

Decided May 1, 1935.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Robbery — Defendant cross-examined concerning other alleged robberies — Judge complimented jury before opportunity given defendant to poll jury.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Ray T. Miller and Messrs. Silber Soltz, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Frederick W. Frey, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said case.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

JONES, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Sugarman et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 1, 1935
195 N.E. 867 (Ohio 1935)
Case details for

Sugarman et al. v. State

Case Details

Full title:SUGARMAN ET AL. v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

195 N.E. 867 (Ohio 1935)
129 Ohio St. 463