From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Danielle Mc. (In re John M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2013
111 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-6

In the Matter of JOHN M. (Anonymous), Jr. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Danielle Mc. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Karen M. (Anonymous), et al., nonparty-respondents (and another proceeding).

Glen A. Suarez, Huntington, N.Y., for respondent-appellant. Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (James G. Bernet of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.


Glen A. Suarez, Huntington, N.Y., for respondent-appellant. Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (James G. Bernet of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Jill D. Weinberg–Daly, Riverhead, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Joseph D. Mirabella, Mastic, N.Y., for nonparty-respondents (no brief filed).

In related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Cheng, J.), dated July 31, 2012, which vacated all orders of protection, and directed the withdrawal of the petition, in the proceeding commenced under Docket No. N–5059–12, and (2) a second order of the same court, also dated July 31, 2012, which vacated all prior orders issued in the proceedings.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother is not aggrieved by the order vacating all orders of protection, and directing the withdrawal of the petition, in the proceeding commenced under Docket No. N–5059–12, or by the vacatur of any other order issued in these child protective proceedings ( see CPLR 5511; Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 A.D.3d 144, 156–157, 904 N.Y.S.2d 132). To the extent that the mother challenges the relocation of the paternal grandparents, who have physical custody of the subject child, she must seek relief in the related custody and visitation proceeding. That matter is not the subject of the orders appealed from.

Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed.

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Danielle Mc. (In re John M.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2013
111 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Danielle Mc. (In re John M.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN M. (Anonymous), Jr. Suffolk County Department of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7181
974 N.Y.S.2d 290

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Abigail R. (In re King D.C.)

To the extent the mother challenges findings by the Family Court that she permanently neglected the subject…

In re King D. C.

To the extent the mother challenges findings by the Family Court that she permanently neglected the subject…