From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sudit v. Schapiro

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 25, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2016-12916

03-25-2020

Vladimir Sudit, etc., appellant, v. Schneuer Z. Schapiro, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant. DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains, NY (Lee S. Wiederkehr, Michael J. Schwarz, and Eric Mandell of counsel), for respondents.


SHERI S. ROMAN JOSEPH J. MALTESE HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ. (Index No. 29209/05)

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains, NY (Lee S. Wiederkehr, Michael J. Schwarz, and Eric Mandell of counsel), for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mark I. Partnow, J.), dated September 21, 2016. The order granted the motion of the defendants Schneuer Z. Schapiro, Chana Schapiro, and Wells Fargo Bank for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

For the reasons stated in Sudit v Eliav ( ___ AD3d ___ [decided herewith]), the order is affirmed.

AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur. ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Sudit v. Schapiro

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 25, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Sudit v. Schapiro

Case Details

Full title:Vladimir Sudit, etc., appellant, v. Schneuer Z. Schapiro, et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)