From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sudbrink v. Garguilo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 28, 2021
196 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2020–01835

07-28-2021

In the Matter of Michael SUDBRINK, petitioner, v. Jerry GARGUILO, etc., et al., respondents.

Zev Goldstein, Monsey, NY, for petitioner. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Theodore D. Sklar of counsel), for respondent Jerry Garguilo. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred Croce of counsel), for respondent Suffolk County District Attorney.


Zev Goldstein, Monsey, NY, for petitioner.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Theodore D. Sklar of counsel), for respondent Jerry Garguilo.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred Croce of counsel), for respondent Suffolk County District Attorney.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Jerry Garguilo, an Associate Justice of the Appellate Term, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts, to grant the petitioner's application for a certificate granting leave to appeal to the Appellate Term, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts, from an order of the Justice Court of the Village of Babylon, Suffolk County, dated July 17, 2019.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

The petitioner's remaining contention is without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sudbrink v. Garguilo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 28, 2021
196 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Sudbrink v. Garguilo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael SUDBRINK, petitioner, v. Jerry GARGUILO, etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

196 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
196 A.D.3d 695

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Menken

A CPLR article 78 proceeding is generally not available for criminal matters (see CPLR 7801[2] ; Matter of…