From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Subbarao v. Citibank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 18, 2024
SACV 24-01083-JVS(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2024)

Opinion

SACV 24-01083-JVS(JDEx)

07-18-2024

Pooja Subbarao v. Citibank N.A. et al


Present: The James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (hi Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to Show Cause (OSC) in writing no later than, July 29, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Joint Rule 26(1) Report with the Court's Attached Exhibit A

It is the plaintiffs responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

Scheduling Conference set for July 22, 2024 is continued to August 5,2024 at 10:30 a.m.

It is so Ordered.


Summaries of

Subbarao v. Citibank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 18, 2024
SACV 24-01083-JVS(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Subbarao v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:Pooja Subbarao v. Citibank N.A. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 18, 2024

Citations

SACV 24-01083-JVS(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2024)