From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suarez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 13, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


Plaintiff was assaulted without provocation by several police officers in 1978. Defendant's contention that there was an insufficient evidentiary basis to support the jury's award for past and future pain and suffering is without merit.

The record supports plaintiff's medical expert's uncontradicted findings that injuries to plaintiff's left frontal region of the head, a result of being struck with the officer's nightstick, caused permanent disfigurement, post-concussion syndrome, suicide attempts, and loss of plaintiff's business and political aspirations due to his incapacity (see, Furia v Mellucci, 163 A.D.2d 88, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 803). Under these circumstances, the award to plaintiff does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501 [c]; see, Capuccio v City of New York, 174 A.D.2d 543, 545 [Asch, J., concurring], lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 751).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

Suarez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Suarez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN SUAREZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 10

Citing Cases

Tucciarello v. Ironwil Associates

Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The jury's award of damages to plaintiffs does not…

Scott v. Posas

by an accident irreconcilable with other findings and against the weight of the evidence]). The award of…