From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Styles v. Cain

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 27, 2017
228 So. 3d 200 (La. 2017)

Opinion

No. 2016–KP–1219

10-27-2017

Glen STYLES v. Burl CAIN


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

Styles v. Cain

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 27, 2017
228 So. 3d 200 (La. 2017)
Case details for

Styles v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:Glen STYLES v. Burl CAIN

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 27, 2017

Citations

228 So. 3d 200 (La. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Styles

The supreme court also found that Defendant had fully litigated two APCRs in state court, that his claims had…