From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stupak-Thrall v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 11, 1996
81 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-1863

April 11, 1996

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows.

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

Stupak-Thrall v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 11, 1996
81 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Stupak-Thrall v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Kathy STUPAK-THRALL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

81 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Stupak-Thrall v. U.S.

Nevertheless, I believe that due regard for Judge Boggs's opposing view compels a brief explanation of the…

U.S. v. Gabrion

Indeed, a majority of this court has at least tacitly endorsed the idea that § 480 provides for concurrent…