From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Studemeyer v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 1, 1922
93 So. 528 (Ala. 1922)

Opinion

6 Div. 678.

June 1, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Wm. E. Fort, Judge.

Palmer H. Bell, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Brief of counsel did not reach Reporter.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach Reporter.


Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree. Appellant reserved a bill of exceptions at the trial, but we find nothing to require extended treatment. Appellant offered to prove difficulties on sundry occasions between deceased and negroes about the plant where appellant and deceased were employed and a "shooting scrape" in another county. We presume this was for the purpose of showing that deceased was a man of violent or turbulent disposition or character. The court's exclusion of this evidence must be approved on two distinct grounds: (1) Appellant did not adopt the proper method of proving character (De Arman v. State, 71 Ala. 351; Lambert v. State, 205 Ala. 547, 88 So. 847), and (2) such evidence was inadmissible in advance of a showing of self-defense (Amos v. State, 96 Ala. 120, 11 So. 424).

There was no error; the sentence of the law must be executed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Studemeyer v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 1, 1922
93 So. 528 (Ala. 1922)
Case details for

Studemeyer v. State

Case Details

Full title:STUDEMEYER v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 1, 1922

Citations

93 So. 528 (Ala. 1922)
93 So. 528

Citing Cases

McCaghren v. State

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., L. G. Kendrick, and George W. Royer, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State. In…

Baker v. State

The mere expressions that one accused of crime can or cannot have a fair and impartial trial are worthless as…