Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc.

Full title: VIRGIL STUCKEY, Plaintiff, v. U.S.A. TRUCKING, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 9, 2015

2:14-cv-1091 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2015)

Opinion

VIRGIL STUCKEY, Plaintiff, v. U.S.A. TRUCKING, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-1091 JAM DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. October 9, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         On October 9, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiff's motion to compel and award sanctions. Attorney Rory Quintana appeared on behalf of the plaintiff and attorney Eliyahu Kaplunovsky appeared on behalf of the defendants.

         Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's motion to compel and award of sanctions (Dkt. No. 31) is granted;

         2. Defendants shall produce responses to the discovery at issue within ten days of the date of this order; and

         3. Defendants shall pay sanctions to plaintiff in connection with the bringing of the motion in the amount of $2, 500 within sixty days of the date of this order.¹

1 Defendants are cautioned that the failure to timely produce the discovery responses at issue, or pay the sanctions awarded, may result in the imposition of more serious sanctions.