Opinion
Civil Action 20-cv-00065-CMA-GPG
05-24-2022
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
On May 20, 2022, Plaintiff Francis Stuckens filed pro se a Motion and Affidavit For Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. (ECF No. 58). However, Plaintiff has not filed a Notice of Appeal. (See docket). Therefore, the Motion and Affidavit For Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 will be denied as premature.
Additionally, the Court finds that, based on the financial information submitted to the Court, Plaintiff fails to show a financial inability to pay the required filing fees. Further, Plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of an appeal.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit For Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. (ECF No. 58) is denied without prejudice.