Opinion
5:22-cv-00701-SPG-MAR
07-23-2024
THOMAS E. STUART, JOSE L. FELIX, and A.F., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SAYORI BALDWIN, BRIDGETTE HERNANDEZ, BRIANNA HALL TARA CORONEL, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants.
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL BY JURY
HON. SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
On June 17, 2024, the foregoing matter was called for trial in Courtroom 5C of the United States District Court, Central District of California, the Honorable Sherilyn Peace Garnett presiding. On June 25, 2024, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding: (1) against Plaintiffs Thomas E. Stuart (“Stuart”), Jose L. Felix (“Felix”), and A.F. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and in favor of Defendant County of Riverside (the “County”); and (2) in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Tara Coronel (“Coronel”).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
That judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of the County and against Plaintiffs, who shall take nothing by way of their First Amended Complaint against the County;
That judgment be, and hereby is, entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Coronel in the amount of $25,000 to Stuart, $25,000 to Felix, and $100,000 to A.F;
That Plaintiffs shall recover post-judgment interest from Coronel pursuant to applicable law; and
That the Court shall retain jurisdiction over any claim for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Section 8.3 of the EBMA and applicable law, to be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2) and Local Rules 54 and 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.