From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Struck v. PNC Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
Civil Action 2:11-CV-982 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:11-CV-982

03-14-2013

LEE W. STRUCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PNC BANK, N.A., Defendant.


Judge Marbley

Magistrate Judge King


ORDER

The Court conferred with counsel for the parties on March 14, 2013.

The parties have agreed to private mediation, currently scheduled to take place on June 18, 2013. The parties ask that the continued preliminary pretrial conference, and the setting of a firm pretrial schedule, await that the outcome of that mediation.

The mediation may have to be rescheduled if the issue of notice to the class remains unresolved. See Notice, Doc. No. 83; Motion to Clarify, Doc. No. 84.

The Court will conduct a continued preliminary pretrial conference on July 16, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. The conference may proceed by telephone. The parties should be prepared to discuss a firm pretrial schedule at that time.

____________________

Norah McCann King

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Struck v. PNC Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
Civil Action 2:11-CV-982 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Struck v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:LEE W. STRUCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PNC BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:11-CV-982 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)