From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stroud v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 18, 2000
16 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76453.

April 18, 2000.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. LUCY D. RAUCH, JUDGE.

John Munson Morris III, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.

Mary S. Choi, 1221 Locust St. Room 350, St. Louis MO 63103 Assistant Public Defender, For Appellant.

Before Crane, P.J., R. Dowd, J., and Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Vernon Stroud ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Defendant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Stroud v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 18, 2000
16 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Stroud v. State

Case Details

Full title:VERNON STROUD, APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 18, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)