Summary
affirming ALJ's decision where plaintiff was found capable of performing duties of a garment bagger despite being limited to "simple, routine, repetitive, tasks with up to 3-step commands"
Summary of this case from Williams v. ColvinOpinion
Case No. 3:13-cv-1518-J-34MCR
03-31-2015
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34; Report), entered on January 28, 2015. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Richardson recommends that the Commissioner's final decision be affirmed. See Report at 19. No objections to the Report have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.
The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).
Upon independent review of the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34) of Magistrate Judge Richardson is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment AFFIRMING the Commissioner's final decision and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, this 31st day of March, 2015.
/s/_________
MARCIA MORALES HOWARD
United States District Judge
ja Copies to: The Honorable Monte C. Richardson
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record