From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stroman v. Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2015
CIV. 2:14-524 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)

Opinion


BENJAMIN STROMAN, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY STATE PRISON WARDEN RON DAVIS IN HIS PERSONAL/INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, et al., Defendants. CIV. No. 2:14-524 WBS CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. November 2, 2015

          ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         On October 21, 2015, Darryl Geyer, an incarcerated witness who was subpoenaed to testify at trial by the defendant, filed a motion to testify via video conference. (Docket No. 75.) Mr. Geyer states that being transported to Sacramento for trial would result in an undue personal hardship and inhibit his ability to become parole suitable. The parties shall file a response to the motion no later than ten court days from the file-stamped date of this Order. The court will then take the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 78-230(h).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stroman v. Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2015
CIV. 2:14-524 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Stroman v. Valley State Prison

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN STROMAN, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY STATE PRISON WARDEN RON DAVIS IN…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 2, 2015

Citations

CIV. 2:14-524 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)