Opinion
Appellate Case No. 2013-000549 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-397
11-12-2014
In re: Estate of Samuel D. Stroman, Decedent. Jamileh S.D. Stroman and Synthia D. Stroman, Respondents, v. Samuel D. Stroman, II, and Sherolyn D. Stroman, Defendants, Of whom Samuel D. Stroman, II, is the Appellant.
Thomas Jefferson Goodwyn, Jr., of Goodwyn Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant. Andrew Sims Radeker, of Harrison & Radeker, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondents.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Orangeburg County Olin Davie Burgdorf, Master-in-Equity
AFFIRMED
Thomas Jefferson Goodwyn, Jr., of Goodwyn Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant. Andrew Sims Radeker, of Harrison & Radeker, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondents. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Indus., Inc., 383 S.C. 601, 606, 681 S.E.2d 885, 888 (2009) ("The decision whether to set aside an entry of default or a default judgment lies solely within the sound discretion of the trial [court]."); id. ("The trial court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of that discretion."); id. at 607, 681 S.E.2d at 888 ("[A] party seeking relief from an entry of default under Rule 55(c) [must] provide an explanation for the default and give reasons why vacation of the default entry would serve the interests of justice."); Howard v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 271 S.C. 238, 241, 246 S.E.2d 880, 882 (1978) (holding a defaulting defendant's participation in a damages hearing is limited to cross-examination of witnesses and objection to evidence); Limehouse v. Hulsey, 404 S.C. 93, 116, 744 S.E.2d 566, 578-79 (2013) (adhering to the procedures adopted in Howard despite the intervening adoption of Rule 55, SCRCP). AFFIRMED.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.