From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strom v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Apr 29, 2022
2:21-cv-00534-SB (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00534-SB

04-29-2022

MARCUS ANDREW STROM Plaintiff, v. BRAD CAIN, et al. Defendant.


CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DESIGNATION OF THE NORMAL APPEAL ROUTE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 73(b), as counsel for the party (parties) identified below, I consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including entry of orders on dispositive motions, trial, and entry of final judgment. I understand that withholding consent will not result in any adverse consequences. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(c), I agree that an appeal from a judgment entered at a Magistrate Judge's direction may be taken to the court of appeals as would any other appeal from a district court judgment.

DATED: _________________

Signature: _________________

Name and OSB ID: _________________

E-mail Address: _________________

Firm Name: _________________

Mailing Address: _________________

City, State, Zip: _________________

Parties Represented: _________________


Summaries of

Strom v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Apr 29, 2022
2:21-cv-00534-SB (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Strom v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS ANDREW STROM Plaintiff, v. BRAD CAIN, et al. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Apr 29, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00534-SB (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2022)