From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strom v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 3, 2008
Civil No. 07-150 (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 3, 2008)

Summary

remanding because ALJ did not explain how he resolved the conflict in the medical opinion evidence

Summary of this case from Aguon v. Astrue

Opinion

Civil No. 07-150 (DWF/RLE).

March 3, 2008

Fay E. Fishman, Esq., Peterson Fishman, counsel for Plaintiff.

Lonnie F. Bryan, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED.

2. The Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED.

3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings, in accordance with this Report.

4. Pursuant to the holding in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Strom v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 3, 2008
Civil No. 07-150 (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 3, 2008)

remanding because ALJ did not explain how he resolved the conflict in the medical opinion evidence

Summary of this case from Aguon v. Astrue
Case details for

Strom v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Mary C. Strom, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 07-150 (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Waters v. Berryhill

When reviewing the Commissioner's decision, the court "must judge the propriety of such action solely by the…

Shelton v. Berryhill

When reviewing the Commissioner's decision, the court "must judge the propriety of such action solely by the…