From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stringham v. Bick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-0286 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0286 MCE DAD P

01-18-2013

GUY T. STRINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. J. BICK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' December 21, 2012 cross-motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 69) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before March 18, 2013. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l).

______________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stringham v. Bick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-0286 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Stringham v. Bick

Case Details

Full title:GUY T. STRINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. J. BICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0286 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)