Opinion
7:20-cv-00145-M
07-21-2021
OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD E. MYERS, II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
This matter comes before the court on Defendant Pender County Sheriffs Department's (the “Department”) motion to dismiss the claims brought against it, filed November 18, 2020. [DE-12]
Within its memorandum in support of its motion, the Department argues that it lacks the capacity to be sued as a matter of law. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure set forth that, for governmental entities, “[c]apacity to sue or be sued [in federal court] is determined ... by the law of the state where the court is located[.]” Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(b)(3); see Avery v. County of Burke, 660 F.2d 111, 113-14 (4th Cir. 1981) (“The capacity of a governmental body to be sued in the federal courts is governed by the law of the state in which the district court is held.”). Therefore, because this court is located within North Carolina, the court looks to North Carolina law to determine whether the Department can be sued.
Under North Carolina law, counties and sheriffs can be sued. See N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 153A-11 (counties), 58-76-5 (sheriffs). But there is no North Carolina statute that allows a county sheriffs department to be sued, and the Department has directed the court's attention to case law from this court holding that the absence of such a statute is fatal to claims brought against North Carolina county sheriffs departments like the Department, [see DE-13 at 2-5 (citing Parker v. Bladen Cnty., 583 F.Supp.2d 736, 740 (E.D. N.C. 2008) (granting county sheriffs department's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss: “ N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-11 acknowledges that a county is a legal entity which may be sued. However, there is no corresponding statute authorizing suit against a North Carolina county's sheriffs department. Accordingly, the Bladen County Sheriffs Department lacks legal capacity to be sued.”))]; see also Wesley v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Cnty. Police Dep't, No. 3:19-cv-00425-FDW-DCK, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181308, at *14-15 (W.D. N.C. Sept. 30, 2020) (same). Plaintiff does not invoke any authority holding otherwise in his response brief. [DE-26] Because Plaintiff does not, the court concludes that Plaintiffs claims against the Department must be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Parker, supra.
SO ORDERED.