From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stringer v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv336 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv336 (WOB-MRM)

08-12-2015

WILLIAM STRINGER PETITIONER v. WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. #13), and the Court being sufficiently advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #11) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. #3), is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by procedural default. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would be objectively frivolous and petitioner therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

This 12th day of August, 2015.

Signed By:

William O . Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stringer v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv336 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Stringer v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM STRINGER PETITIONER v. WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv336 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2015)