From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stricklen v. Nordtrom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 11, 2023
1:23-cv-00719-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00719-GSA-PC

05-11-2023

MARK EDWARD STRICKLEN, Plaintiff, v. NORDTROM, Defendant.


DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT: JUNE 1, 2023

ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SIGNATURE

(ECF NO. 1)

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mark Edward Stricklen (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint is unsigned. All filings submitted to the court must bear the signature of the filing party. Local Rule 131; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint, filed on May 10, 2023, is STRICKEN from the record for lack of signature;

2. The Clerk's Office shall send Plaintiff a § 1983 form complaint;

3. Plaintiff is required to file an amended complaint bearing Plaintiff's original signature on or before June 1, 2023; and

4. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stricklen v. Nordtrom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 11, 2023
1:23-cv-00719-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Stricklen v. Nordtrom

Case Details

Full title:MARK EDWARD STRICKLEN, Plaintiff, v. NORDTROM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 11, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00719-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)