From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Inst.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Apr 20, 2009
Case No. 1:08cv131 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:08cv131.

April 20, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on April 3, 2009 (Doc. 18).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Petitioner's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss and Strike Habeas Corpus (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice subject to refiling once Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Strickland v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Inst.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Apr 20, 2009
Case No. 1:08cv131 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Strickland v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Inst.

Case Details

Full title:Desco Strickland, Petitioner, v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Apr 20, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:08cv131 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 20, 2009)