From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stribling v. Bortolemedi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 1, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-3247 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3247 CKD P

04-01-2013

AARON STRIBLING, Plaintiff, v. BORTOLEMEDI, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 70) is denied.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stribling v. Bortolemedi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 1, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-3247 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Stribling v. Bortolemedi

Case Details

Full title:AARON STRIBLING, Plaintiff, v. BORTOLEMEDI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3247 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2013)