Opinion
04-22-00116-CR
03-08-2022
James STRIBLIN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR4270 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice.
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order denying his motion to recuse the trial court judge who presided over the proceedings that resulted in appellant's 2017 convictions.
An order denying a motion to recuse is not a final, appealable order; it may be reviewed only in an appeal from a final judgment. Green v. State, 374 S.W.3d 434, 445 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). An appeal of the decision to deny a motion to recuse, standing alone, would be improper. Id. Here, appellant is not challenging the order in an appeal from the final judgments in his underlying criminal cases.
Also, it appears the order from which appellant attempts to appeal arises from a post-conviction request for relief. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 484 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (per curiam). There is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the procedure under Article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding).
For the above reasons, it appears we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Therefore, appellant is ORDERED to show cause in writing, no later than March 22, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court.